Content about Asia

May 10, 2013

 

A well-known tradition of the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad ibn Abdullah, peace and blessing of Allah be upon him, enjoins Muslims to ‘seek knowledge even unto China’ in their quest to acquire the knowledge to live enlightened lives as cultured and educated servants of the Almighty Creator, fulfilling their obligations to Him, society and family. Although China was considered a great distance from where Al Islam was originally established in Arabia, the Arabs had knowledge of China even before the advent of the Holy Last Messenger ( peace and blessing be upon him), as Arabia served as a major highway for commercial traffic between it, China and the countries of Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Cypress and parts of southern Turkey. 

 

The historian Sir Arnold Thomas Walker, in his detailed work entitled The Preaching of Islam, describes the arrival and spread of Islam in China. At the start of the 7th century, a trade hub was established by Chinese merchants in Siraf, a town on the Persian Gulf, frequented by the traders of Arabia and Persia. Yet, the commercial contact also introduced the Chinese to the culture and mores of the Arabs, and eventually to the new way of life that was reforming the Arabian Peninsula - Al Islam. 

Between the sixth and ninth centuries, C.E., during the Tang dynasty, the Arabs and Persians found the trade so lucrative that they took up residence in many of China’s port cities, where they conducted their business in perfect harmony with their host counterparts. Eventually, the numbers of immigrants increased dramatically, in a flow that seemed to inundate certain areas. Chinese historians of this period, Mr.Walker stated, mention the Arabs (Muslims) in their writings, in one instance describing them as ‘barbarians’ who arrived in their land ‘like a deluge (flood)’, coming from great distances and from “more than 100 kingdoms, bringing as tribute their sacred books, which were received and deposited in the hall set apart for translations of sacred and canonical books in the Imperial Palace.” It is stated that during this time, religious diversity was appreciated and respected. 

The Annals of Kwangtung (Canton ), recount the first Muslims who came to China, describing them as ‘strangers’ who came from ‘Annan, Cambodia, Medina, and several other countries, who worshipped heaven (i.e. Almighty God) and had neither statue, idol nor image in their temples…They do not eat pork or drink wine and they regard as unclean the flesh of any animal not killed [by] themselves…” Muslim and Chinese historians as well, give an account of a delegation of emissaries of the third Khalifa of Islam, Umar ibn Al-Khattab, (may Allah be pleased with him). This entourage was led by Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas (may Allah be pleased with him) , a maternal uncle of the Holy Last Messenger, peace and blessing be upon him, and were well received by the emperor, who commissioned the building of the Memorial Mosque in Canton, the first mosque in the country. The Muslim enclave imported their way of life, i.e., their cultural trappings, language and dress, and lived apart from the Chinese population. Between the years 960 and 1279 C.E., Muslims had become very influential and prosperous in the import/export industry in China, and the numbers of Muslims continued to increase due to immigration of people from other lands, intermarriage, and conversion of native Chinese to Islam. During the era of the Yuan dynasty, the Mongol conquests carried Islam throughout distant places and resulted in the forced migration of vast numbers of Muslims from broadly diverse places and ethnicities (Arabs, Persians, Turks and others) with the intention by the government to use their skills and services to administer the expanding empire. 

The vast influx of people constituted merchants, artisans, artists, architects, engineers, medical doctors and astronomers, as well as soldiers and prisoners of war, and settlers who, by the hundreds of thousands, became permanently settled, developing into flourishing and proliferating communities. 

Over time, intermixing blended ethnicities and homogenized the population; through marriage, the Muslims passed down the Islamic religion and culture, which continued down generations. 

As the Mongols ruled China, many Muslims held prominent positions within the government hierarchy , one such being Umar Shams al-Din (Sayyid Ajall of Bukhara) an accountant under Qubilay Khan, who reigned during the Yuan Dynasty from 1259 to 1368, who became financial manager of Imperial funds and governor of Yunnan, along with a number of other Muslims who were appointed to lofty positions. He was held in high esteem as a pious administrator who promoted religious fairness. Yet, the native Chinese, in time, began to resent that fact of immigrants (and particularly Muslims) holding such high offices, discontent that would fuel the desire to recover the control of China from the Mongols. 

Marco Polo of Italy, close friend of Qubilay Khan, lived in China for nearly twenty years, and reported that Muslims lived throughout Yunnan, and noted that the entire capital city of Yunnan, Taifu, was inhabited by Muslims. The renowned Muslim traveler Ibn Battutah visited several Chinese coastal towns and expressed in his travelogue his elation at being shown such a ‘hearty welcome’ by his Muslim hosts, reporting that in each town, the Muslims resided in their own ‘quarter’ where their mosques were located and they freely practiced Islam. 

With the decline and expulsion of the remnants of the Mongol dynasty in the latter years of the 14th century, and the isolationist policy adopted by China at that time, Muslim communities experienced lack of growth and expansion. Having been cut off from dealings with other Muslims outside of China, the Muslims in some parts of the country began to adopt many of the cultural and customary mores of their hosts and merged with the Chinese population, producing an amalgamation of the two cultures. 

The new emperor of the Ming dynasty extended privilege upon these Muslims which promoted prosperity during the period between 1369 and the middle of the 16th century C.E., a sign of which was the construction of a great number of mosques. The emperors of the Ming dynasty developed amiable relations with the Muslim rulers to the west of their empire, and as Walker states, ‘there was frequent exchange of embassies between them.’ He continues to give an account of one Chinese Muslim ruler, Shah Rukh Bahadur, who sent an invitation to the Emperor to accept Islam when his ambassador arrived at Shah Rukh Bahadur’s court in Samarqand. He sent his envoy, who accompanied the Chinese ambassador back to China, with two letters, one of which was written in Arabic. The letter read as follows: “ In the name of God, The Merciful, The Compassionate. There is no god save God; Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the Apostle of God. The apostle of God, Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “ There shall not cease to be in my community people abiding in the commandments of God: whosoever fails to help them or opposes them shall never prosper until the Commandment of the Lord cometh. When the Most High God proposed to create Adam and his race, He said ‘I was a Hidden Treasure, but it was My pleasure to become known; I therefore created man that I might be known.’ It is manifest from hence, that The Divine purpose (great is His Power and exalted is His Word!) in the creation of man was to make Himself known and uplift the banners of right guidance and faith. Wherefore, He sent His Apostle (peace be upon him) with guidance and the religion of Truth that it might prevail over all other faiths, though the polytheists turn away from it, that He might make known the laws and ordinances and the observances of what is lawful and unlawful, and He gave him the Holy Qur’an miraculously that thereby, he might put to silence the unbelievers and stop their mouths when they discussed and disputed with him, and by His Perfect Grace and His All-Pervading Guidance, He has caused it to remain even unto the Day of Judgment. By His Power He has established in all ages and times and in all parts of the world, in east and west, and in China, a mighty monarch, lord of great armies and authority, to administer justice and mercy and spread the wings of peace and security over the heads of men; to enjoin upon them righteousness and warn them against evil and disobedience and lift up among them the banners of the noble religion...The Most High God thus disposes our hearts by His past mercies and His ensuing Grace to strive for the establishing of the laws of pure religion and the continuance of the ordinances of the shining path. He also bids us administer justice to our subjects in all suits and cases in accordance with the religion of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the ordinances of the Chosen One, and build mosques and colleges and monasteries and hermitages and places of worship, that the teaching of the sciences and school of learning may not cease nor the memorials and injunctions of religion be swept away. Seeing that the continuance of worldly prosperity and dominion, and the permanence of authority and rule depend upon the assistance given to Truth and Righteousness and the extirpation of the evils caused by idolatry and unbelief from the earth, in the expectation of blessing and reward, we, therefore, hope that your Majesty and the nobles of your realm will agree with us in these matters and join us in strengthening the foundation of the established law.” 

The second letter, written in Persian, made a very direct, simple appeal: “ The Most High God, having in the depth of His Wisdom and the perfection of His Power, created Adam (peace be upon him),made some of his sons prophets and apostles and sent them among men to summon them to the Truth. To certain of these prophets, such as Abraham, Moses, David, and Muhammad (peace be upon them) He gave a Book and taught a Law, and He bade the people of their time follow the law and religion of each of them. All these apostles invited men to faith in the Unity and to the worship of [Almighty] God and forbade the adoration of the sun, moon, stars, of kings and idols; and though each one of these apostles had a separate law, yet, they were all agreed in the doctrine of the Unity of The Most High God. At length, when the apostolic and prophetic office devolved on the Apostle Muhammad Mustafa (peace and blessing be upon him) all other systems of law were abrogated. He was the apostle and the prophet of the latter age, and it behooves the whole world – lords and kings and ministers, rich and poor, small and great – to observe his law and forsake all past creeds and laws. This is the true and perfect faith and is called Islam.” The writer, the Muslim ruler Shah Rukh Bahadur, continued by relating the evolution of his ancesters , descendents of Ghengis Khan and relatives who came before him and how they had dispersed to varied lands where they assumed rule of the people of those places. He stated that some of them accepted Islam – Uzbek Khan, Chani Khan and Urus Khan. Hulaga Khan was given command over Khurasan, Iraq and the neighboring countries, and some of his sons who succeeded him received into their hearts the light of the law of Muhammad (peace be upon him) becoming Muslims and being honored with the blessedness of Al Islam, departed this world eventually. He continued by naming closer relatives of his – ‘the truthful king Ghazan and Ulyaytu Sultan and the fortunate king Abu Sa’id Bahadur, until my honored father, Amir Timur Gurgan, succeeded the throne. He too observed the law of Muhammad (peace be upon him)in all the countries under his rule, and throughout his reign the followers of the faith of Islam enjoyed prosperity. Now that by the goodness and favor of [Almighty] God , this kingdom of Khurasan, Iraq, Ma-wara’al nahr has passed into my hands, the administration is carried on throughout the whole kingdom in accordance with the pure law of the Prophet (peace be upon him)’ righteousness is enjoined and wrong forbidden, and the Yarghu and institutes of Chingiz (Ghengiz) Khan have been abolished... I hope that by the bounty and benevolence of God you too will observe the law of Muhammad, the Apostle of God (peace be upon him) and strengthen the religion of Islam so that you may exchange the transitory sovereignty of this world for the sovereignty of the world to come.” 

A Muslim merchant named Sayyid Ali Akbar wrote that at the end of the fifteenth and beginning of the sixteenth century he spent time in Peking and stated that in the city of Kenjanfu there were as many as 30,000 Muslim families settled there: “…they paid no taxes and enjoyed the favor of the Emperor, who gave them grants of land; they enjoyed complete toleration for the exercise of their religion, and in the capital itself there were four great mosques and about ninety more in the other provinces of the empire – all erected at the cost of the Emperor.” It is recorded that the Muslims in China lived there peacefully until the reign of the Manchu dynasty, when they were oppressed in the province of Kansu in 1648 and a revolt ensued. However, Walker states that not until the nineteenth century did any Muslim revolt in China result in seriously disrupting the good relations that the Muslims enjoyed with the Chinese Emperors, to the extent that the Emperor Yung Chen, in 1771, issued an edict stating that the Chinese Muslims were to be left alone, permitted full exercise of their religion and culture, which coincided with and respected the tradition and law of China - he stated, “ What more can be asked for? 

May 7, 2013

Last March, the town of Meiktila, located at the city center of Myanmar and home to its Airforce Central Command, suffered a massacre of Muslims at the hands of Buddhist monks. According to government reports, 43 Muslims were killed; and 1,227 homes, 77 shops and 37 mosques were destroyed in a gross display of religious intolerance. The violence quickly spread to affect other townships in the Thayarwaddy District of the Bago Region. In every corner of the world, through every media outlet, there is a strong push to spotlight reports of Muslim aggression, but those voices weaken as the Muslim minority of Myanmar face apparent ethnic cleansing by the majority Buddhists who are relentlessly murdering, pillaging and torturing innocent men, women and children. 

Freelance Journalist Assed Baig visited Myanmar to gather information about the gruesome attacks from first hand eyewitnesses like ‘Muhammed’, who used an alternate name to protect his identity. His account underscores the ravage upon the Muslims in this region who are subjected not only to murder and mayhem, but acts of humiliation. Muhammed explains a devastating incident regarding the murder of his friend as they attempted to walk through a mob of Buddhist monks to the safety of police, “We had to put our hands over our heads and bow our heads and pay homage to the monks as we walked… They began to attack us. I saw my friends murdered… They dragged Abu Bakr away as he attempted to get on the truck, and began to beat him; he was still alive when they threw him in the fire. He stood back up, and then they stabbed him in the stomach with a sword, twisting it whilst it was in him.” What is to become of the children who witness these horrific events? Violence begets violence. Humanity must be taken to account and not allow what is clearly ethnic cleansing to be perpetrated by the Buddhist majority. 

Muslims have been in the country of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, for over 1,000 years and in sharp contrast to the recent years of violence, have lived in relative peace with its Buddhist neighbors as is the case in many nations- even those where Muslims are the majority. Ethnic Rohingyas, the largely Muslim population, has lived in the country of Myanmar primarily in the Rakhine state for generations, but is still denied citizenship. In Meiktila about 30% of the population is Muslim, many coming from nearby China, but also from Bangladesh and India during the time of British rule, which ended in 1948. 

In November 2012, anti-Muslim violence left over 140 Rohingyas murdered with over 100,000 displaced from their homes while police stood by taking no action to protect them until after the damage was complete. Are the local authorities contributing to the swell of Islamophobia or even escalating the intensity as a result of their inaction? After the massacre in March at Meiktila, the president of Myanmar, Thein Sein, spoke at a national address, “I would like to warn all political opportunists and religious extremists who try to exploit the noble teachings of these religions and have tried to plant hatred among people of different faiths for their own self-interest: their efforts will not be tolerated”. 

Nevertheless, those affected most are seeing the slaughter of Muslims continue unabated. In an open letter to President Sein, the Islamic Religious Affairs Council and the Myanmar Muslim National Affairs Organisation wrote: “These violent attacks include crimes such as arson and massacres which deserve heavy penalties…However, in this situation the authorities neglected to take swift and effective action against the perpetrators who recklessly committed crimes in front of them. Massacres and damage to religious buildings and property are due to the weakness of the responsible authorities to protect and take effective action. Nyunt Maung Shein, president of the country’s Islamic Religious Affairs Council exclaimed, “All Muslims living in Myanmar are worried about this. What will happen to our faith? How can we live in this Buddhist society?” 

Earlier this year, human rights groups swiftly expressed public condemnation at those that who burned and looted a Christian minority town in Pakistan, when it was incorrectly attributed to be the result of Muslim religious aggression and persecution. The truth prevailed and the root of the violence was simply the greed of all involved, including officials who were found to be complicit in the events. When global occurrences present a different picture whereby Muslims are under threat or imminent persecution, those same voices must rise to the occasion and save the lives of innocent men, women and children. 

Some believe the root cause of the recent escalation of violence in Myanmar is politically motivated, and thus using religion as an easy differentiator to pit the poor against the poor; neighbor against neighbor. In a March 25 address, the United Nations Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide Adama Dieng, stated that recognizing the root cause of this problem is key, “Failing to do so can have serious future consequences which the international community has solemnly promised to prevent.” 

The surge in Islamophobia in the region is attributed to radical Buddhist Monks who intend to challenge the new government’s plan to continue reforms leading to an increasingly democratic state that would include recognition of Bangladeshi and other groups who have been settled in the region for hundreds of years. One such extremist is Wirathu, a Buddhist monk sentenced to 25 years in prison for instigating violence against Muslims, but who is now free in an amnesty agreement to release political prisoners. Wirathu tours the country giving speeches that identify Muslims as “the enemy”. This derogatory rhetoric has paved the way for brutal murder and complacency from Myanmar’s local government officials. This same destructive propaganda is fully underway around the world, even in the United States of America, where freedom of speech is currently under assault by those who wish to vilify Islam and commit ‘freedom of action’ against those who practice a peaceful religion. Currently, American Muslims face unprecedented violence and prejudice based on fear initiated through the promotion of an Islamophobic ideology by those who flagrantly deliver speeches of hate. Should the Muslim minority in America look forward to the horrific realities of Myanmar? 

In his address on Myanmar, the United Nations Adama Dieng reiterated, “As a country that has positively surprised the international community with its recent transformation towards democracy, Myanmar needs to demonstrate that the rule of law will prevail and that all those living within its borders are and will be protected from violence and discrimination, particularly on the basis of religion or ethnicity.” It is time for more than voices, but the hands of strength and humanity must assist in the relief for the people of Myanmar so they no longer have to live in a constant state of fear. 

On April 18, over 10,000 miles away from their home, a group of nineteen Myanmar Muslims living in the United States traveled to a special masjid in the Catskill mountains of New York for prayer. In the masjid known as Baitullah, the personal name of Almighty God, Allah, appeared on the wall and has been shining from its Divine source for almost three years. It is there that the Myanmar Muslims prayed for their slain countrymen and made supplication to Almighty God for peace and justice. The Islamic tradition teaches that the Holy Last Messenger, Muhammad (peace be upon him) declared Almighty God will never reject the supplication of one who is oppressed and furthermore reiterated, “Beware of the supplication of the unjustly treated, because there is no shelter or veil between it, the supplication of the one who is suffering injustice, and Allah Glory be upon Him. 

May 7, 2013

Last March, the town of Meiktila, located at the city center of Myanmar and home to its Airforce Central Command, suffered a massacre of Muslims at the hands of Buddhist monks. According to government reports, 43 Muslims were killed; and 1,227 homes, 77 shops and 37 mosques were destroyed in a gross display of religious intolerance. The violence quickly spread to affect other townships in the Thayarwaddy District of the Bago Region. In every corner of the world, through every media outlet, there is a strong push to spotlight reports of Muslim aggression, but those voices weaken as the Muslim minority of Myanmar face apparent ethnic cleansing by the majority Buddhists who are relentlessly murdering, pillaging and torturing innocent men, women and children. 

Freelance Journalist Assed Baig visited Myanmar to gather information about the gruesome attacks from first hand eyewitnesses like ‘Muhammed’, who used an alternate name to protect his identity. His account underscores the ravage upon the Muslims in this region who are subjected not only to murder and mayhem, but acts of humiliation. Muhammed explains a devastating incident regarding the murder of his friend as they attempted to walk through a mob of Buddhist monks to the safety of police, “We had to put our hands over our heads and bow our heads and pay homage to the monks as we walked… They began to attack us. I saw my friends murdered… They dragged Abu Bakr away as he attempted to get on the truck, and began to beat him; he was still alive when they threw him in the fire. He stood back up, and then they stabbed him in the stomach with a sword, twisting it whilst it was in him.” What is to become of the children who witness these horrific events? Violence begets violence. Humanity must be taken to account and not allow what is clearly ethnic cleansing to be perpetrated by the Buddhist majority. 

Muslims have been in the country of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, for over 1,000 years and in sharp contrast to the recent years of violence, have lived in relative peace with its Buddhist neighbors as is the case in many nations- even those where Muslims are the majority. Ethnic Rohingyas, the largely Muslim population, has lived in the country of Myanmar primarily in the Rakhine state for generations, but is still denied citizenship. In Meiktila about 30% of the population is Muslim, many coming from nearby China, but also from Bangladesh and India during the time of British rule, which ended in 1948. 

In November 2012, anti-Muslim violence left over 140 Rohingyas murdered with over 100,000 displaced from their homes while police stood by taking no action to protect them until after the damage was complete. Are the local authorities contributing to the swell of Islamophobia or even escalating the intensity as a result of their inaction? After the massacre in March at Meiktila, the president of Myanmar, Thein Sein, spoke at a national address, “I would like to warn all political opportunists and religious extremists who try to exploit the noble teachings of these religions and have tried to plant hatred among people of different faiths for their own self-interest: their efforts will not be tolerated”. 

Nevertheless, those affected most are seeing the slaughter of Muslims continue unabated. In an open letter to President Sein, the Islamic Religious Affairs Council and the Myanmar Muslim National Affairs Organisation wrote: “These violent attacks include crimes such as arson and massacres which deserve heavy penalties…However, in this situation the authorities neglected to take swift and effective action against the perpetrators who recklessly committed crimes in front of them. Massacres and damage to religious buildings and property are due to the weakness of the responsible authorities to protect and take effective action. Nyunt Maung Shein, president of the country’s Islamic Religious Affairs Council exclaimed, “All Muslims living in Myanmar are worried about this. What will happen to our faith? How can we live in this Buddhist society?” 

Earlier this year, human rights groups swiftly expressed public condemnation at those that who burned and looted a Christian minority town in Pakistan, when it was incorrectly attributed to be the result of Muslim religious aggression and persecution. The truth prevailed and the root of the violence was simply the greed of all involved, including officials who were found to be complicit in the events. When global occurrences present a different picture whereby Muslims are under threat or imminent persecution, those same voices must rise to the occasion and save the lives of innocent men, women and children. 

Some believe the root cause of the recent escalation of violence in Myanmar is politically motivated, and thus using religion as an easy differentiator to pit the poor against the poor; neighbor against neighbor. In a March 25 address, the United Nations Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide Adama Dieng, stated that recognizing the root cause of this problem is key, “Failing to do so can have serious future consequences which the international community has solemnly promised to prevent.” 

The surge in Islamophobia in the region is attributed to radical Buddhist Monks who intend to challenge the new government’s plan to continue reforms leading to an increasingly democratic state that would include recognition of Bangladeshi and other groups who have been settled in the region for hundreds of years. One such extremist is Wirathu, a Buddhist monk sentenced to 25 years in prison for instigating violence against Muslims, but who is now free in an amnesty agreement to release political prisoners. Wirathu tours the country giving speeches that identify Muslims as “the enemy”. This derogatory rhetoric has paved the way for brutal murder and complacency from Myanmar’s local government officials. This same destructive propaganda is fully underway around the world, even in the United States of America, where freedom of speech is currently under assault by those who wish to vilify Islam and commit ‘freedom of action’ against those who practice a peaceful religion. Currently, American Muslims face unprecedented violence and prejudice based on fear initiated through the promotion of an Islamophobic ideology by those who flagrantly deliver speeches of hate. Should the Muslim minority in America look forward to the horrific realities of Myanmar? 

In his address on Myanmar, the United Nations Adama Dieng reiterated, “As a country that has positively surprised the international community with its recent transformation towards democracy, Myanmar needs to demonstrate that the rule of law will prevail and that all those living within its borders are and will be protected from violence and discrimination, particularly on the basis of religion or ethnicity.” It is time for more than voices, but the hands of strength and humanity must assist in the relief for the people of Myanmar so they no longer have to live in a constant state of fear. 

On April 18, over 10,000 miles away from their home, a group of nineteen Myanmar Muslims living in the United States traveled to a special masjid in the Catskill mountains of New York for prayer. In the masjid known as Baitullah, the personal name of Almighty God, Allah, appeared on the wall and has been shining from its Divine source for almost three years. It is there that the Myanmar Muslims prayed for their slain countrymen and made supplication to Almighty God for peace and justice. The Islamic tradition teaches that the Holy Last Messenger, Muhammad (peace be upon him) declared Almighty God will never reject the supplication of one who is oppressed and furthermore reiterated, “Beware of the supplication of the unjustly treated, because there is no shelter or veil between it, the supplication of the one who is suffering injustice, and Allah Glory be upon Him. 

January 29, 2013

 

Cairo -When most people think of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the first thoughts that come to mind after Hajj and Mecca are fancy cars, oil sheikhs and palaces. The government flaunts and advertises its wealth and lavish lifestyle as though such opulence is standard living and common to all.

For those who believe in monarchies, the fact that the Saudi royal family owns palaces with gold embellishments and luxury vehicles that carry them to and fro is merely par for the course.  However something is awry in a country where a monarchy squanders its wealth while poverty and hunger remain an everyday battle for 60% of the population.  Press TV reported that “sixty percent of people in Saudi Arabia live below the poverty line according to Saudi activists, although official reports state only 22%” of its people are impoverished.  Surely the ruling royal family is aware of this sad and desperate situation.

November 27, 2012

With the continuing destruction of holy Shrines in Libya and in Mali, one should ask:  who are these instigators bringing terror to the Muslims and Christians in East and West Africa, who is financing them and how did they come into existence?

 

With the continuing destruction of holy Shrines in Libya and in Mali, one should ask:  who are these instigators bringing terror to the Muslims and Christians in East and West Africa, who is financing them and how did they come into existence?

 

For the past decade, the news has been filled with reports of tragic incidents happening in Muslim countries and acts of terror around the world perpetrated by so-called ‘Muslims’, to the point that it is not surprising that some people, ignorant of Islam and of its history, would have doubt that Islam is a religion of peace.

 

However,  the real news lies in observing how little the western media and the international press, in particular,  has done to expose the people that are behind the ‘ radicalization’ of the poor and the rise of extremism around the world, and it is necessary to educate its audience as to who are  the real victims of this violence and extremism. Why have so very few investigative journalists traced the ties between their governments and the financiers of world terrorism and oppression?  

 

The rising of radical extremism in Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan,  Libya, Mali and other African countries known for their tolerance and peaceful coexistence did not just happen in a day. Islam in Africa, as anywhere else in the world, was adopted by the people due to the impartial justice of its social and  legal systems and code of ethics - regardless of whether the parties involved in a dispute were wealthy or poor, man or woman, and no matter what religion they followed.

 

Islam’s message of peace and of unity to mankind as all being from the ‘children of Adam’ was spread by some of the most illustrious Sufis the world has known, such as Shehu Uthman Dan Fodio and his son Muhammed Bello in West Africa, Ahmad Tijan and Abdel Kader of Algeria in the North of Africa and southern Europe, Sufi Masters Ali Hujweri and Moinuddin Chisti in Asia - and may Almighty Allah be pleased with them all.. Even in recent times, the work of His Eminence Sheikh Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani and others on the American continent and in Europe are examples of how Islam is spread by love, compassion and good works, rather than violence and hatred.

 

No matter how distant the actions perpetrated by Wahabis in the name of Islam are to real Islam and sincere Muslims, the international press keeps branding the Wahhabi culprits as ‘Islamists’ and likening them and their actions to  Islam, while omitting the tragedies and suffering of the victims - who, in most instances, are Muslims. Former president of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, alluded to this sobering fact during a CNN interview, when in response to a comment about Pakistan’s abridged efforts to pursue alleged ‘terrorists’, Mr. Musharraf replied with indignation that after the Pakistani people had suffered as the first and biggest  victims of acts of terrorism for so many years, why are Americans still doubting Pakistan’s intentions?

However, when it comes to the allies of the West, like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, against whom similar allegations of abated pursuit of so-called ‘terrorists’ have also been lodged, there is a complete silence from the media, even though their involvement in the actual sponsoring and assistance to radical groups is common knowledge. Iyad Ag Ali, the leader of the Salafi group ‘Ansardeen’, a previously unknown group that is causing mayhem and mischief in northern Mali, after being removed by ex- Malian president Amadou Toumani Toure as a member of Mali’s diplomatic staff in Jeddah for associating with proscribed extremist figures or groups in Saudi Arabia, was said to have visited Qatar. But little has been said about those links and no condemnation whatsoever has been heard from the countries that are involved the so-called ‘war on terror’. Why?

 

According to many in the Algerian press, Qatar’s objective has been to spread fanatical Wahabi ideology and destabilising the oil and gas-rich states as a means of gaining access to their resources. They see the situation in the North of Mali as being part of the larger narrative about the Arab uprisings, which presents Algeria as a bastion of stability being encircled by Islamist forces.

 

To prove the point of the influence of Qatar and Saudi Arabia in the north of Mali:  during the destruction of the shrines, Ban Ki Moon , the UN Secretary General called and requested help from Qatar and the Saudis, asking for their intervention instead of closer regional countries such as Morocco and Algeria, knowing fully the closer ties between them (Qatar and Saudi Arabia) and the extremists of Iyad Ag Ali and Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).

 

It is a well known fact that for the past two decades Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Wahabi-prone regimes, with their Petro-dollars, have been financing radicalization and fanaticism in mosques and Muslim organisations of poor African countries. In poor countries like Mali,  the destruction of the education system  by the implementation of IMF/World Bank restructuring program has left the door wide opened for Wahhabi groups to provide financing for the indigent preachers and to give the population millions of free books promoting the extremist, unIslamic views of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab.

 

It is hard for uneducated, impoverished  people  to comprehend the menace that the Wahabi presence creates until the reality is obvious.  At first, the people welcome them and  let them teach and do their preaching,  thinking they are propagating genuine Islamic doctrine. Much later, the unsuspecting hosts find out that  in the warped and devious Wahhabi perspective, they do not even consider some Muslims who oppose their flawed views as Muslim, and finally, the people become oppressed in their beliefs and in their practice of Islam. 

When visiting villages around the country, you can see how little people know about Wahhabis, their doctrine and  their history. As an example, in Timbuktu, a famous city known worldwide and especially in the Islamic world for religious knowledge, literature and learning, the people welcomed Ansardeen, who ally themselves with the AQIM, following the pillage of the city by some local Arabs and the MNLA (Mouvement National pour la Liberation de l’Azwad) rebels because they stopped the pillage and brought a little bit of security after the horror stories of raping and stealing of people properties. 

But a few weeks following the arrival of Ansardeen and AQIM, the reality was clear -  they recognized the vast contrast between their beliefs. Since the extremists took control of the city, locals are forbidden to sell or to read in public books such as Dalaaïl-lil-Khairat – which is a book praising Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).  In the major mosques of the city, the Wahhabi occupiers  threatened to remove the imams, and in one case, a threat was made on the life of an imam, if he did not stop making supplications in group after the five daily congregational prayers.

The population is living in fear and even to participate in circle of zikr – where Allah is  praised and glorified - they are forced to hide, fearing reprisal because according to the Wahhabis  this is an unacceptable innovation to their view of Islam, just as the building of shrines for some of the greatest scholars the country has known is deemed an innovation.

It is now as clear as day that  the Wahabis are at war against true Islam. At least for most of the residents in Timbuktu, it is tragically clear, and they question “how they are going to come and do their jihad here, when we are Muslim? Why don’t they go to convert non-Muslims instead and leave us alone?”  Finally they realize, “ Timbuktu has been invaded more than 16 times and will be free again. This is just a test from Allah.”

November 27, 2012

With the continuing destruction of holy Shrines in Libya and in Mali, one should ask:  who are these instigators bringing terror to the Muslims and Christians in East and West Africa, who is financing them and how did they come into existence?

 

With the continuing destruction of holy Shrines in Libya and in Mali, one should ask:  who are these instigators bringing terror to the Muslims and Christians in East and West Africa, who is financing them and how did they come into existence?

 

For the past decade, the news has been filled with reports of tragic incidents happening in Muslim countries and acts of terror around the world perpetrated by so-called ‘Muslims’, to the point that it is not surprising that some people, ignorant of Islam and of its history, would have doubt that Islam is a religion of peace.

 

However,  the real news lies in observing how little the western media and the international press, in particular,  has done to expose the people that are behind the ‘ radicalization’ of the poor and the rise of extremism around the world, and it is necessary to educate its audience as to who are  the real victims of this violence and extremism. Why have so very few investigative journalists traced the ties between their governments and the financiers of world terrorism and oppression?  

 

The rising of radical extremism in Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan,  Libya, Mali and other African countries known for their tolerance and peaceful coexistence did not just happen in a day. Islam in Africa, as anywhere else in the world, was adopted by the people due to the impartial justice of its social and  legal systems and code of ethics - regardless of whether the parties involved in a dispute were wealthy or poor, man or woman, and no matter what religion they followed.

 

Islam’s message of peace and of unity to mankind as all being from the ‘children of Adam’ was spread by some of the most illustrious Sufis the world has known, such as Shehu Uthman Dan Fodio and his son Muhammed Bello in West Africa, Ahmad Tijan and Abdel Kader of Algeria in the North of Africa and southern Europe, Sufi Masters Ali Hujweri and Moinuddin Chisti in Asia - and may Almighty Allah be pleased with them all.. Even in recent times, the work of His Eminence Sheikh Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani and others on the American continent and in Europe are examples of how Islam is spread by love, compassion and good works, rather than violence and hatred.

 

No matter how distant the actions perpetrated by Wahabis in the name of Islam are to real Islam and sincere Muslims, the international press keeps branding the Wahhabi culprits as ‘Islamists’ and likening them and their actions to  Islam, while omitting the tragedies and suffering of the victims - who, in most instances, are Muslims. Former president of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, alluded to this sobering fact during a CNN interview, when in response to a comment about Pakistan’s abridged efforts to pursue alleged ‘terrorists’, Mr. Musharraf replied with indignation that after the Pakistani people had suffered as the first and biggest  victims of acts of terrorism for so many years, why are Americans still doubting Pakistan’s intentions?

However, when it comes to the allies of the West, like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, against whom similar allegations of abated pursuit of so-called ‘terrorists’ have also been lodged, there is a complete silence from the media, even though their involvement in the actual sponsoring and assistance to radical groups is common knowledge. Iyad Ag Ali, the leader of the Salafi group ‘Ansardeen’, a previously unknown group that is causing mayhem and mischief in northern Mali, after being removed by ex- Malian president Amadou Toumani Toure as a member of Mali’s diplomatic staff in Jeddah for associating with proscribed extremist figures or groups in Saudi Arabia, was said to have visited Qatar. But little has been said about those links and no condemnation whatsoever has been heard from the countries that are involved the so-called ‘war on terror’. Why?

 

According to many in the Algerian press, Qatar’s objective has been to spread fanatical Wahabi ideology and destabilising the oil and gas-rich states as a means of gaining access to their resources. They see the situation in the North of Mali as being part of the larger narrative about the Arab uprisings, which presents Algeria as a bastion of stability being encircled by Islamist forces.

 

To prove the point of the influence of Qatar and Saudi Arabia in the north of Mali:  during the destruction of the shrines, Ban Ki Moon , the UN Secretary General called and requested help from Qatar and the Saudis, asking for their intervention instead of closer regional countries such as Morocco and Algeria, knowing fully the closer ties between them (Qatar and Saudi Arabia) and the extremists of Iyad Ag Ali and Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).

 

It is a well known fact that for the past two decades Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Wahabi-prone regimes, with their Petro-dollars, have been financing radicalization and fanaticism in mosques and Muslim organisations of poor African countries. In poor countries like Mali,  the destruction of the education system  by the implementation of IMF/World Bank restructuring program has left the door wide opened for Wahhabi groups to provide financing for the indigent preachers and to give the population millions of free books promoting the extremist, unIslamic views of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab.

 

It is hard for uneducated, impoverished  people  to comprehend the menace that the Wahabi presence creates until the reality is obvious.  At first, the people welcome them and  let them teach and do their preaching,  thinking they are propagating genuine Islamic doctrine. Much later, the unsuspecting hosts find out that  in the warped and devious Wahhabi perspective, they do not even consider some Muslims who oppose their flawed views as Muslim, and finally, the people become oppressed in their beliefs and in their practice of Islam. 

When visiting villages around the country, you can see how little people know about Wahhabis, their doctrine and  their history. As an example, in Timbuktu, a famous city known worldwide and especially in the Islamic world for religious knowledge, literature and learning, the people welcomed Ansardeen, who ally themselves with the AQIM, following the pillage of the city by some local Arabs and the MNLA (Mouvement National pour la Liberation de l’Azwad) rebels because they stopped the pillage and brought a little bit of security after the horror stories of raping and stealing of people properties. 

But a few weeks following the arrival of Ansardeen and AQIM, the reality was clear -  they recognized the vast contrast between their beliefs. Since the extremists took control of the city, locals are forbidden to sell or to read in public books such as Dalaaïl-lil-Khairat – which is a book praising Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).  In the major mosques of the city, the Wahhabi occupiers  threatened to remove the imams, and in one case, a threat was made on the life of an imam, if he did not stop making supplications in group after the five daily congregational prayers.

The population is living in fear and even to participate in circle of zikr – where Allah is  praised and glorified - they are forced to hide, fearing reprisal because according to the Wahhabis  this is an unacceptable innovation to their view of Islam, just as the building of shrines for some of the greatest scholars the country has known is deemed an innovation.

It is now as clear as day that  the Wahabis are at war against true Islam. At least for most of the residents in Timbuktu, it is tragically clear, and they question “how they are going to come and do their jihad here, when we are Muslim? Why don’t they go to convert non-Muslims instead and leave us alone?”  Finally they realize, “ Timbuktu has been invaded more than 16 times and will be free again. This is just a test from Allah.”

August 26, 2012

 

DO DONTREI, Cambodia -- It was four gray skulls resting on a bed of jumbled bones that again triggered Chea Nouen's memories: breast-feeding her baby with her hands and feet shackled; her husband thrown into a pit to be turned into human fertilizer, her own marches to the killing fields – where she was saved three times by an executioner.

The past came hurtling back earlier this month when a new mass grave was discovered in this village in northwestern Cambodia, one of the bloodiest killing grounds in the country. Like most of Cambodia's some 300 known mass grave clusters, it is not being investigated or exhumed to find out what happened.

More than three decades after the Khmer Rouge ultra-revolutionaries orchestrated the deaths of nearly 2 million people, or one out of every four Cambodians, this country has not laid its ghosts to rest. Cambodia's regime prefers to literally bury the past, especially since some of its current leaders, including Prime Minister Hun Sen, were once Khmer Rouge.

But 63-year-old Chea Nouen and other survivors in this small, farming community cannot forget, hold their tears in check or banish the nightmares when they daily tread over the unexamined bones of 35,000 victims and live among restless souls that still hover, they believe, over homes and rice fields. Also unfinished is the pursuit of justice: Neither the three top Khmer Rouge leaders nor local executioners have been punished, with the exception of a controversial jail sentence of 19 years for the former prison chief known as Comrade Duch.

In April, Chea Nouen was invited to the capital, Phnom Penh, to hear a top Khmer Rouge official, Nuon Chea, offer his defense to a U.N.-backed tribunal: I didn't know. I was just carrying out orders. It's an exaggeration. The U.N. and the tribunal say they are following the law. But Chea Nouen calls the trial "an absurdity," incredulous that it has taken six years, $160 million and mountains of documents to prove a case against three now feeble octogenarians when all seems so starkly clear to the villagers at Do Dontrei.

"At my age and health, I cannot confront the Khmer Rouge, " says the 63-year-old woman. "But I would be pleased to tell my story."

___

Her body is almost skeletal and wracked by persistent illnesses from the Khmer Rouge years, but Chea Nouen's animated face, striking poses and still supple hands conjure up the past in powerful pantomime.

She contorts her body, demonstrating how her legs and arms were bound to an iron bar. Her face grimaces in remembered pain. A soldier points a pistol to her temple, another searches her body for hidden valuables. In shock, she drops her 2-month-old son to the prison floor. For seven days, almost sleepless and surviving on just water, she cradles her child, twisting her body to allow him to suckle at her breasts. Chea Nouen, back in the present, brushes tears away with a yellow towel.

 

Their family, with two children, had been arrested one morning while riding in an ox-cart. A day after her release, her husband was taken away to the foot of a hill, close by the recently discovered grave, where the Khmer Rouge vented their hatred of former government soldiers like him with singular fury.

Blindfolded, hands tied behind their backs, they were savagely beaten, slashed with machetes and pushed into pits stocked with rice husks that were set ablaze. The ashes and decomposed bodies fused into fertilizer to be scattered over the rice fields.

Although still under official arrest, Chea Nouen was released to a Khmer Rouge complex that included dormitories, a warehouse and communal dining. She grew vegetables, worked grueling hours in the rice paddies and kitchen. One of her sons succumbed to illness, the other died of starvation.

Of the hundreds of workers who passed through the center, all of them women, only seven survived the deprivation and a methodical killing machine not unlike those at Nazi concentration camps. Executions took place once or twice a week, with batches of 60 to 80 prisoners, and often timed to the fertilizer production.

"We are all just like fish in the water. One day they will hook us all," she told a co-worker who sensed her own time had come and asked Chea Nouen to take gold she had secreted to pass on one day to her children. Chea Nouen declined, believing she herself wouldn't survive. The following day, after the evening meal, her friend disappeared.

Chea Nouen rises, head bent to the ground, her arms clasped behind her as if pinioned by ropes. She is trudging off with a line of others toward the pits. The killers await them, naked torsos sweating. She hears shouts, wailing and cursing from those about to die. Then, the chief of the execution squad, a man she had provided with bath water, halts the file of prisoners.

"I don't know why he was so kind and saved my life. He did it three times. Maybe he felt sympathy for me. Maybe he loved me," she says. Nhorn was the only name she knew him by, and after the Khmer Rouge downfall she never saw him again.

"Whenever I think of the Khmer Rouge time I don't feel hunger or thirst," she says, sinking into her chair in a ramshackle hut open to the rains and mosquitoes. "I feel nothing except the feeling that I am already dead."

She has a proper house in the village, home to some 600 people, but prefers the forest retreat where she can better raise chickens, ducks and four cows, and where there is a peace and quiet for which she longs.

Her face still flushed, Chea Nouen ends her story on a lighter note, relating how a ghost appeared in the dream of the businessman who bought the land with the skulls from a farmer, one day after the remains were found. The spectral visitor recommended he go for the number 50 in a lottery. He won $1,500 and paid for a ceremony at the newly-found grave.

"My husband never comes to see me or give me a winning lottery number, so I'm still poor," she laughs. "I didn't even pray for a lottery number at the ceremony. I just thanked the spirits for saving my life."

___

The remains from the grave were placed in a makeshift shrine under the shade of three palm trees, and the villagers of Do Dontrei brought soup, rice, desserts and a little money to the crude altar as offerings.

They worry that the spirits are troubled. There is a widespread belief in Cambodia that the bones of the deceased – especially those who met violent deaths – should be collected, cremated and prayed over lest they remain in the place they died to haunt the living.

But rural folk – the "little people," as they have been called – still have little voice or legal recourse in face of rich power-brokers, and the businessman who purchased the land for $4,700 for construction has close connections in the nearby provincial capital of Siem Reap. So the digging continues.

Khung Leang, a handsome 53-year-old woman with a ready smile, says she may never know where her entire family lies. She conducted rites for their souls, but they still return to her in disturbing dreams.

"They stood here. But they refused to come up," she says, sitting on steps leading to the first story of her stilt-propped house. "My father said, `I can't enter because there is a stick in the house and I will be beaten.' I didn't know, but there was actually one there. I threw it away, and a few days later they came again. And again they refused to come into the house. My father just stood on these steps, crying."

Khung Leang thinks of the "crimes" that led to the slaughter of her mother, her father and all six of her siblings. They had been damned as "rich capitalists" because they sold sweets in the market. Later, they were discovered eating chicken soup one night as a family, violating bans on private property and eating outside communal quarters. The last of her father's three "crimes" was "destroying Khmer Rouge property" by failing to stop cows he was ordered to herd from grazing in a rice field.

Her father was taken away first. She doesn't know how he died. Later she was told that before his execution, he pleaded with friends: "Please take care of my daughter. She will soon be alone."

And she was. They all followed him, even the youngest, her four-year-old sister, because the Khmer Rouge liked to say: "If you don't want grass to grow you have to pull out all the roots underneath."

Like Chea Nouen, she regards her cheating of death – twice – as miraculous.

Like many women and despite protest, she was forced into marriage with a man the Khmer Rouge had chosen for her. And like many young couples, they were assigned to a mobile brigade, tasked with back-breaking work in remote areas after separation from their families. She was away when her family was exterminated.

Sometime later, she and others were being herded to an execution site when a Khmer Rouge cadre suddenly barked, "That is enough. We have reached our quota today. Take the others back."

A cooling evening breeze sweeps through the garden around Khung Leang's home as she finishes her tale, one with a happy ending. A sprightly little girl, one of six grandchildren, rushes into her arms. A handsome 23-year-old son returns from teaching school.

Their family makes ends meet, growing rice and vegetables and still selling the traditional sweets from rice and palm sugar that once precipitated the tragedy. Her husband – the same she once adamantly rejected – drives a motorcycle taxi.

"He is a very kind-hearted man," she says.

___

Pools of stagnant, milky green water lay at the bottom of the burial pits. The backhoe gouged out more earth.

"If the investigators don't come and conduct a proper search, all the remains will soon disappear," said farmer Chhorn Kry, standing at the grave's edge, near where nine members of his wife's family were executed.

The survivors of Do Dontrei believe the spirits are still trapped. They say the graves must be opened, with proper rites, so that the spirits can fly, look for their relatives and ascend to heaven. Chea Nouen compares it to water flowing out after a bottle is opened.

Khung Leang adds a contemporary, political twist to the ancient belief: "There are many souls still with us here. They are wandering around our village, hovering above us, because they are still waiting for justice."

 

___

Associated Press writer Sopheng Cheang and photographer Heng Sinith in Cambodia contributed to this story.

August 26, 2012

 

DO DONTREI, Cambodia -- It was four gray skulls resting on a bed of jumbled bones that again triggered Chea Nouen's memories: breast-feeding her baby with her hands and feet shackled; her husband thrown into a pit to be turned into human fertilizer, her own marches to the killing fields – where she was saved three times by an executioner.

The past came hurtling back earlier this month when a new mass grave was discovered in this village in northwestern Cambodia, one of the bloodiest killing grounds in the country. Like most of Cambodia's some 300 known mass grave clusters, it is not being investigated or exhumed to find out what happened.

More than three decades after the Khmer Rouge ultra-revolutionaries orchestrated the deaths of nearly 2 million people, or one out of every four Cambodians, this country has not laid its ghosts to rest. Cambodia's regime prefers to literally bury the past, especially since some of its current leaders, including Prime Minister Hun Sen, were once Khmer Rouge.

But 63-year-old Chea Nouen and other survivors in this small, farming community cannot forget, hold their tears in check or banish the nightmares when they daily tread over the unexamined bones of 35,000 victims and live among restless souls that still hover, they believe, over homes and rice fields. Also unfinished is the pursuit of justice: Neither the three top Khmer Rouge leaders nor local executioners have been punished, with the exception of a controversial jail sentence of 19 years for the former prison chief known as Comrade Duch.

In April, Chea Nouen was invited to the capital, Phnom Penh, to hear a top Khmer Rouge official, Nuon Chea, offer his defense to a U.N.-backed tribunal: I didn't know. I was just carrying out orders. It's an exaggeration. The U.N. and the tribunal say they are following the law. But Chea Nouen calls the trial "an absurdity," incredulous that it has taken six years, $160 million and mountains of documents to prove a case against three now feeble octogenarians when all seems so starkly clear to the villagers at Do Dontrei.

"At my age and health, I cannot confront the Khmer Rouge, " says the 63-year-old woman. "But I would be pleased to tell my story."

___

Her body is almost skeletal and wracked by persistent illnesses from the Khmer Rouge years, but Chea Nouen's animated face, striking poses and still supple hands conjure up the past in powerful pantomime.

She contorts her body, demonstrating how her legs and arms were bound to an iron bar. Her face grimaces in remembered pain. A soldier points a pistol to her temple, another searches her body for hidden valuables. In shock, she drops her 2-month-old son to the prison floor. For seven days, almost sleepless and surviving on just water, she cradles her child, twisting her body to allow him to suckle at her breasts. Chea Nouen, back in the present, brushes tears away with a yellow towel.

 

Their family, with two children, had been arrested one morning while riding in an ox-cart. A day after her release, her husband was taken away to the foot of a hill, close by the recently discovered grave, where the Khmer Rouge vented their hatred of former government soldiers like him with singular fury.

Blindfolded, hands tied behind their backs, they were savagely beaten, slashed with machetes and pushed into pits stocked with rice husks that were set ablaze. The ashes and decomposed bodies fused into fertilizer to be scattered over the rice fields.

Although still under official arrest, Chea Nouen was released to a Khmer Rouge complex that included dormitories, a warehouse and communal dining. She grew vegetables, worked grueling hours in the rice paddies and kitchen. One of her sons succumbed to illness, the other died of starvation.

Of the hundreds of workers who passed through the center, all of them women, only seven survived the deprivation and a methodical killing machine not unlike those at Nazi concentration camps. Executions took place once or twice a week, with batches of 60 to 80 prisoners, and often timed to the fertilizer production.

"We are all just like fish in the water. One day they will hook us all," she told a co-worker who sensed her own time had come and asked Chea Nouen to take gold she had secreted to pass on one day to her children. Chea Nouen declined, believing she herself wouldn't survive. The following day, after the evening meal, her friend disappeared.

Chea Nouen rises, head bent to the ground, her arms clasped behind her as if pinioned by ropes. She is trudging off with a line of others toward the pits. The killers await them, naked torsos sweating. She hears shouts, wailing and cursing from those about to die. Then, the chief of the execution squad, a man she had provided with bath water, halts the file of prisoners.

"I don't know why he was so kind and saved my life. He did it three times. Maybe he felt sympathy for me. Maybe he loved me," she says. Nhorn was the only name she knew him by, and after the Khmer Rouge downfall she never saw him again.

"Whenever I think of the Khmer Rouge time I don't feel hunger or thirst," she says, sinking into her chair in a ramshackle hut open to the rains and mosquitoes. "I feel nothing except the feeling that I am already dead."

She has a proper house in the village, home to some 600 people, but prefers the forest retreat where she can better raise chickens, ducks and four cows, and where there is a peace and quiet for which she longs.

Her face still flushed, Chea Nouen ends her story on a lighter note, relating how a ghost appeared in the dream of the businessman who bought the land with the skulls from a farmer, one day after the remains were found. The spectral visitor recommended he go for the number 50 in a lottery. He won $1,500 and paid for a ceremony at the newly-found grave.

"My husband never comes to see me or give me a winning lottery number, so I'm still poor," she laughs. "I didn't even pray for a lottery number at the ceremony. I just thanked the spirits for saving my life."

___

The remains from the grave were placed in a makeshift shrine under the shade of three palm trees, and the villagers of Do Dontrei brought soup, rice, desserts and a little money to the crude altar as offerings.

They worry that the spirits are troubled. There is a widespread belief in Cambodia that the bones of the deceased – especially those who met violent deaths – should be collected, cremated and prayed over lest they remain in the place they died to haunt the living.

But rural folk – the "little people," as they have been called – still have little voice or legal recourse in face of rich power-brokers, and the businessman who purchased the land for $4,700 for construction has close connections in the nearby provincial capital of Siem Reap. So the digging continues.

Khung Leang, a handsome 53-year-old woman with a ready smile, says she may never know where her entire family lies. She conducted rites for their souls, but they still return to her in disturbing dreams.

"They stood here. But they refused to come up," she says, sitting on steps leading to the first story of her stilt-propped house. "My father said, `I can't enter because there is a stick in the house and I will be beaten.' I didn't know, but there was actually one there. I threw it away, and a few days later they came again. And again they refused to come into the house. My father just stood on these steps, crying."

Khung Leang thinks of the "crimes" that led to the slaughter of her mother, her father and all six of her siblings. They had been damned as "rich capitalists" because they sold sweets in the market. Later, they were discovered eating chicken soup one night as a family, violating bans on private property and eating outside communal quarters. The last of her father's three "crimes" was "destroying Khmer Rouge property" by failing to stop cows he was ordered to herd from grazing in a rice field.

Her father was taken away first. She doesn't know how he died. Later she was told that before his execution, he pleaded with friends: "Please take care of my daughter. She will soon be alone."

And she was. They all followed him, even the youngest, her four-year-old sister, because the Khmer Rouge liked to say: "If you don't want grass to grow you have to pull out all the roots underneath."

Like Chea Nouen, she regards her cheating of death – twice – as miraculous.

Like many women and despite protest, she was forced into marriage with a man the Khmer Rouge had chosen for her. And like many young couples, they were assigned to a mobile brigade, tasked with back-breaking work in remote areas after separation from their families. She was away when her family was exterminated.

Sometime later, she and others were being herded to an execution site when a Khmer Rouge cadre suddenly barked, "That is enough. We have reached our quota today. Take the others back."

A cooling evening breeze sweeps through the garden around Khung Leang's home as she finishes her tale, one with a happy ending. A sprightly little girl, one of six grandchildren, rushes into her arms. A handsome 23-year-old son returns from teaching school.

Their family makes ends meet, growing rice and vegetables and still selling the traditional sweets from rice and palm sugar that once precipitated the tragedy. Her husband – the same she once adamantly rejected – drives a motorcycle taxi.

"He is a very kind-hearted man," she says.

___

Pools of stagnant, milky green water lay at the bottom of the burial pits. The backhoe gouged out more earth.

"If the investigators don't come and conduct a proper search, all the remains will soon disappear," said farmer Chhorn Kry, standing at the grave's edge, near where nine members of his wife's family were executed.

The survivors of Do Dontrei believe the spirits are still trapped. They say the graves must be opened, with proper rites, so that the spirits can fly, look for their relatives and ascend to heaven. Chea Nouen compares it to water flowing out after a bottle is opened.

Khung Leang adds a contemporary, political twist to the ancient belief: "There are many souls still with us here. They are wandering around our village, hovering above us, because they are still waiting for justice."

 

___

Associated Press writer Sopheng Cheang and photographer Heng Sinith in Cambodia contributed to this story.

August 25, 2012

Israel's Channel 10  suggests, in no uncertain terms, that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is "determined to attack Iran before the US elections" and that the "time for action is getting closer." 

 

Israel's Channel 10  suggests, in no uncertain terms, that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is "determined to attack Iran before the US elections" and that the "time for action is getting closer." 

"Israel is now closer than ever to a strike designed to thwart Iran’s nuclear drive". 

This timely report suggests that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak firmly believe that President Obama "would have no choice but to give backing for an Israeli attack" were it to be waged before the November presidential elections:

The TV station’s military reporter Alon Ben-David, who earlier this year was given extensive access to the Israel Air Force as it trained for a possible attack, reported that, since upgraded sanctions against Iran have failed to force a suspension of the Iranian nuclear program in the past two months,“from the prime minister’s point of view, the time for action is getting ever closer.”

Asked by the news anchor in the Hebrew-language TV report how close Israel now was to “a decision and perhaps an attack,” Ben-David said: “It appears that we are closer than ever.”

He said it seemed that Netanyahu was not waiting for a much-discussed possible meeting with US President Barack Obama, after the UN General Assembly gathering in New York late next month — indeed, “it’s not clear that there’ll be a meeting.” In any case, said Ben-David, “I doubt Obama could say anything that would convince Netanyahu to delay a possible attack.”

There is considerable opposition to an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, the report noted — with President Shimon Peres, the army’s chief of the General Staff and top generals, the intelligence community, opposition leader Shaul Mofaz, “and of course the Americans” all lined up against Israeli action at this stage. 

But, noted Ben-David, it is the Israeli government that would have to take the decision, and there Netanyahu is “almost guaranteed” a majority. Other Hebrew media reports on Tuesday also said Netanyahu had dispatched a senior official, National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror, to update the elderly spiritual leader of the Shas ultra-Orthodox coalition party, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, on the status of the Iranian nuclear program, in order to try to win over Shas government ministers’ support for an attack. (Times of Israel, emphasis added)

In an earlier report, Richard Silverstein provides details of a leaked military document (translated from the Hebrew) which outlines the nature of Netanyahu's proposed "shock and awe attack" on Iran:     

The Israeli attack will open with a coordinated strike, including an unprecedented cyber-attack which will totally paralyze the Iranian regime and its ability to know what is happening within its borders.  The internet, telephones, radio and television, communications satellites, and fiber optic cables leading to and from critical installations—including underground missile bases at Khorramabad and Isfahan—will be taken out of action.  The electrical grid throughout Iran will be paralyzed and transformer stations will absorb severe damage from carbon fiber munitions which are finer than a human hair, causing electrical short circuits whose repair requires their complete removal.  This would be a Sisyphean task in light of cluster munitions which would be dropped, some time-delayed and some remote-activated through the use of a satellite signal.

A barrage of tens of ballistic missiles would be launched from Israel toward Iran.  300km ballistic missiles would be launched from Israeli submarines in the vicinity of the Persian Gulf.  The missiles would not be armed with unconventional warheads [WMD], but rather with high-explosive ordnance equipped with reinforced tips designed specially to penetrate hardened targets.

The missiles will strike their targets—some exploding above ground like those striking the nuclear reactor at Arak–which is intended to produce plutonium and tritium—and the nearby heavy water production facility; the nuclear fuel production facilities at Isfahan and facilities for enriching uranium-hexaflouride.  Others would explode under-ground, as at the Fordo facility.

A barrage of hundreds of cruise missiles will pound command and control systems, research and development facilities, and the residences of senior personnel in the nuclear and missile development apparatus.  Intelligence gathered over years will be utilized to completely decapitate Iran’s professional and command ranks in these fields.

After the first wave of attacks, which will be timed to the second, the “Blue and White” radar satellite, whose systems enable us to perform an evaluation of the level of damage done to the various targets, will pass over Iran.  Only after rapidly decrypting the satellite’s data, will the information be transferred directly to war planes making their way covertly toward Iran.  These IAF planes will be armed with electronic warfare gear previously unknown to the wider public, not even revealed to our U.S. ally.  This equipment will render Israeli aircraft invisible.  Those Israeli war planes which participate in the attack will damage a short-list of targets which require further assault.

Among the targets approved for attack—Shihab 3 and Sejil ballistic missile silos, storage tanks for chemical components of rocket fuel, industrial facilities for producing missile control systems, centrifuge production plants and more.

Richard Silverstein underscores the fact that there is considerable opposition within Israel to the Netanyahu-Barak plan to bomb Iran, which would be waged as a means to (allegedly) ensuring the "safety of Israel" against Iran.  

Will this Israeli opposition prevail were a decision to be taken by Netanyahu and his Defense Minister to carry out an attack plan? 

Is Netanyahu a US Political Proxy?  

Who is backing Netanyahu? There are powerful economic interests in the US who are in favor of an attack on Iran. 

Is this an Israeli war project or is Israel's prime minister a US political proxy, acting on behalf of  the Pentagon?  

What happens if Netanyahu gives the order to attack? Will this order be carried out by Israel's high command despite extensive opposition from within Israel's Armed Forces? 

The issue is not whether Washington will grant a green light to Israel before the US elections as conveyed by the the Israeli media.

The fundamental question is twofold.

1. Who at the political level decides on launching this war? Washington or Tel Aviv? Who are the economic powers elites which overshadow the political process in both the US and Israel?

2. Who ultimately decides-- in terms of military command and control-- in carrying out a large scale theater war in the Middle East: Washington or Tel Aviv?  

Israel is a de facto US military outpost in the Middle East. US and Israeli command structures are integrated, with close consultations between the Pentagon and Israel's Ministry of Defense. Reported last January, a large number of US troops are to be stationed in Israel. Joint war games between the US and Israel are also envisaged.

US-Israel-NATO war plans directed against Iran have been ongoing since 2003 including the deployment and stockpiling of advanced weapons systems. 

The Israeli media reports are misleading. Israel cannot under any circumstances wage a war on Iran without the military backing of the US and NATO. 

Advanced weapons systems have been deployed. US and allied Special Forces as well as intelligence operatives are already on the ground inside Iran. US military drones are involved in spying and reconnaissance activities. 

Bunker buster B61 tactical nuclear weapons are slated to be used against Iran in retaliation for its alleged nuclear weapons program.

Military actions against Iran are coordinated with those pertaining to Syria.

What we are dealing with is a global military agenda, centralized and coordinated by US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) involving complex logistics, liaison with various military and intelligence entities. In 2005, USSTRATCOM was identified as "the lead Combatant Command for integration and synchronization of DoD-wide efforts in combating weapons of mass destruction." This Combatant Command integration also included coordination with America's allies including NATO, Israel and a number of frontline Arab states, which are members of NATO's Mediterranean dialogue.

In this broader context of imperial warfare coordinated out of USSTRATCOM in liaison with US Central Command (USCENTCOM), Netanyahu's attack plan against Iran, conveys the illusion that Tel Aviv rather than Washington calls the shots on waging a war on Iran.

The Israeli media reports mentioned above convey the impression that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are in a position to act independently of Washington as well as force Obama into supporting Israel's attack on Iran.

The notion that Israel could act alone and against the interests of the US is part of a subtle disinformation campaign. There is a longstanding foreign policy practice for Washington to encourage its close allies to take the first step in unleashing a war, with the Pentagon pulling the military strings in the background.

Let us be under no illusion, the war plans directed against Iran, which have been on the Pentagon's drawing board since 2003, are established at the highest levels in Washington in consultation and coordination with Tel Aviv and NATO headquarters in Brussels. 

While Israel participates in the conduct of war, it does not play an overriding central role in setting the military agenda.

July 31, 2012

July 1, 2012, will remain a sad day for Mali, the Islamic world and humanity as a whole. On this day, centuries-old Sufi shrines and mosques of the ancient city of Timbuktu, known as the "City of 333 Saints", began to be systematically demolished by Wahhabi extremists who are wrongly portrayed as Muslims – or hard-line Sunnis - although their actions and beliefs have nothing to do with Islam.

 

July 1, 2012, will remain a sad day for Mali, the Islamic world and humanity as a whole. On this day, centuries-old Sufi shrines and mosques of the ancient city of Timbuktu, known as the "City of 333 Saints", began to be systematically demolished by Wahabi extremists who are wrongly portrayed as Muslims – or hard-line Sunnis - although their actions and beliefs have nothing to do with Islam.

The extremists ordered residents to leave, then started razing the tombs, witnesses said. "They were shooting in the air to warn people of going near and entering the area," local resident Allimam Oumar said of the attacks.

Some of the destroyed sites, like the shrines of Sidi Mahmoud Ben Amar, Alfa Moya Lamtouni and Cheikh Sidi El Mokhtar Ben Sidi Mohammed, as well as the main gate of the Sidi Yahya mosque, had been added to the UNESCO World Heritage registry in 1988.
It is reported that since the destroying of the sites, Timbuktu residents have formed armed brigades to protect remaining holy places.
"Today, we have a vigilance brigade so that no one touches the mausoleums of Araouane and Gasser-Cheick (in the city of Timbuktu)… We are armed and there is the required number of people," said Tahel Ould Sidi, leader of the brigade, to AFP. "We are not going to allow people who know nothing about Islam to come and destroy our treasures. I studied in Mauritania and Saudi Arabia, no one tells us in the Holy Quran that we should destroy tombs," he added. Destructive of Islamic heritage, Wahabi doctrine holds that the preservation of sacred monuments and tombs in reverence and respect is a dilution of Islamic monotheism and a prohibited form of idol worship. Setting the example, the Saudi Arabian government, the founders and promoters of Wahabism worldwide, have destroyed all the ancient homes and historical monuments associated with the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad, peace be upon him, the blessed members of his household and holy companions, blessings be upon them.

Only the most holy tomb of the Holy Last Messenger, peace be upon him, remains intact in Medina for fear of an overwhelming outcry from the Muslim world that would serve to expel the Saudis from ruling the holy land. In addition, a great deal of money remains to be had from pilgrims who travel to Medina and to Makkah, where the Holy Ka'aba remains situated since originally constructed by the Holy Messenger Abraham, peace be upon him.
The events occurring in the north of Mali stand as a reminder of the many crimes the followers of Wahabi ideology have committed throughout the world. Always under the false pretence of fighting idolatry, they will go to any degree to push their extreme views.

YEARS OF TERROR

In 2010, extremists bombed the shrine of well-known sufi master and wali, Hazrat Data Ganj Baksh Ali Hujweri, in Lahore, Pakistan, killing 42 people.

 

In April 2011, during the annual festival at a large Sufi shrine in southern Punjab in Pakistan, two suicide bombers set off an explosion killing more than 40 worshippers and injuring hundreds more.

 

Again in April 2011, in the Egyptian town of Qalyoub, armed with crowbars and sledgehammers, two dozen salafi fanatics arrived at the Sidi Abdel Rahman shrine in the middle of the night aiming to smash it to pieces. Five other shirnes in Qalyoub were destroyed soon after Hosni Mubarak's fall from power. Following these events, the head of al-Azhar, Sheikh Ahmed El-Tayyib, has called for efforts to confront hardline extremist doctrine.

 

In January of this year, following the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, extremists bulldozed their way into a Benghazi cemetery and carted off the remains of 29 respected sages and scholars to dump elsewhere. When militants threatened Libya's biggest shrine at Zlitan in March, armed volunteers rushed there in pick-up trucks mounted with weapons to defend it.

“From the time of their inception, the Wahabis have waged war against Muslims, particularly targeting the descendants of Holy Last Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him," says International Qur'anic Open University Chief Executive, the Honorable Dr. Khalifa Hussein Adams. "Wahabism is an independent religion that was founded by Ibn Abdul Wahhab and supported by the British in order to occupy the Holy land. Thus, the term ‘Wahabi Islam’ is absolutely wrong....Wahabism does not recognize Islam and Muslims their co-religious counterparts."

Extremism, terrorism and fanaticism against Muslims reigns in Wahabi ideology; this same spirit served to massacre a half million Muslims in the bloody takeover of Arabia. The Honorable Dr. Adams continues: In the sacking of Taif, the Wahabis “killed every woman, man and child they saw, slashing with their swords even babies in cradles. The streets were flooded with blood. Citizens who surrendered in their houses were executed, their bodies trampled by horses and left unburied. Their homes were looted and their possessions scattered, later to be washed away by rain. The Wahabis then set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds in the city, followed by the mosques and Islamic schools, or madrassas. They destroyed the tombs of the grandson of Prophet Mohammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) Hazrat Imam Hussain, may Allah be pleased with him."

A Sign of the Last Days?
On July 2, the extremists destroyed the gate of the Sidi Yahya Mosque, named for one of the first imams of Timbuktu. Using rifle butts, picks, and shovels, they bashed in the entrance of the mosque. It is said by local residents that the long-sealed doorway, which has been closed for centuries, would not be opened until the last days of the world.

The extremists, in their fanaticism, said they wanted to prove to the people that this was a false sign and that the world would not end. But in fact, in their ignorance, their action became a proof of the veracity of the saying on the opening of the Sidi Yahya mosque main door.
As has been mentioned many times by the Vice Chancellor of the International Qur’anic Open University, El-Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani, and by many other scholars,  we are at the end of time. The signs of the last days mentioned by the Holy Last Messenger (peace be upon him) have already occurred.

Since the month of August 2010, in Holy Islamberg, New York, Allah’s Name has been shining. According to His Eminence El Sheikh Gilani, this is a sign for humanity and the last warning for the rejecters of truth.

The opening of the Sidi Yahya masjid main door is said by locals to be a proof, as well.
Declaration:
Not a single Muslim has been found destroying churches, synagogues, mosques and monuments in which the name of God is commemorated, nor are Muslims to be found committing suicide bombings and killing innocent people.

The public must know that the people committing crimes of violence in the name of Islam seek to create Islamophobia in the West and elsewhere in the world and to propagate the evil from their gospel written by their own prophet Ibn Abdul Wahhab, a dupe of the British secret service.

Wherever the peaceful culture of Islam remains, Wahabis envision their religion dominating and do not shrink from terrorism to achieve their goals. Such crimes are not and have been committed not by Muslims, but by enemies of Islam. Knowledge of past and present events make apparent the reality and truth.

May 27, 2012

The American Muslim Medical Relief Team (AMMRT) appeal to the United Nations to aid the people of Pakistan who are still reeling from the environmental damage caused by the devastating earthquakes and floods in the past few years. The people have received precious little assistance in their time of need from the government of Pakistan, who has taken the funds meant to rebuild the communities and transferred the monies to international banks, thus embezzling millions and crippling the economy.

 

We, the American Muslim Medical Relief Team (AMMRT), appeal to the United Nations to aid the people of Pakistan who are still reeling from the environmental damage caused by the devastating earthquakes and floods in the past few years. The people have received precious little assistance in their time of need from the government of Pakistan, who has taken the funds meant to rebuild the communities and transferred the monies to international banks, thus embezzling millions and crippling the economy. The results are the shutdown of basic necessities  such as gas and power across the nation.

Sources close to the AMMRT have reported that in Faisalabad, the workers in the cloth mills are suffering with no money, resorting to selling their children and even to committing suicide. Even though this is a very heinous sin for Muslims, such is their current sense of hopelessness.

The AMMRT was formed under the auspices of the Vice Chancellor of the International Qur’anic Open University, El Sheikh Syed Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani, and is composed of American healthcare professionals who have placed their lives in jeopardy and selflessly given their monies, time, and medical expertise after catastrophic disasters around the world including Ground Zero, Hurricane Katrina, as well as the calamitous earthquakes and floods in Pakistan.
In the aftermath of the 2005 Pakistan earthquake, millions were left homeless, sick, and starving with little hope that their situation would change.  Monies and other capital donated by many nations of the world, including the United States, were misappropriated by corrupt government officials to help bolster their own political standing.  The result was a tremendous increase in not only the percentage of the population in poverty, but a greater separation between the classes. This was seen firsthand by the AMMRT team as we worked in the Ayyub Medical Center in Abbottabad, where on a daily basis we witnessed poor patients being left for dead and not given even subpar treatment; whereas, their more affluent counterparts received the best the hospital had to offer.  In one particular instance, a pregnant mother and her unborn child both died because the hospital would not allow us to “waste” the use of an Ultrasonography machine.

This same scenario  presented itself once again in the wake of the floods that ravished the Punjab province in 2010. Following a month of monsoon activity, floods devastated much of the area, displacing about 20 million people, submerging about 1000 miles of roads under water, and killing approximately 10 million head of livestock.  Also, millions fell ill due to the microbe-friendly environment created by the stagnant water.     

Presently,  the government of Pakistan has become non-existent, having given the citizens only false promises, while fleecing them of the billions of rupees in aid money that the country has received from all over the world.  To add insult to injury, the government has increased the price of food and other essentials, ensuring that more people will suffer.  The squandering of donated aid and resources in this fashion has made the recovery from disasters of this caliber  almost impossible.

The United Nations - and the world - must act today!

The UN was formed not only to establish world peace, facilitate friendly dialogue between neighboring countries, and to prevent a third world war, but also to help rebuild nations in the aftermath of disasters by providing support to the people affected by these events.  Now more than ever, your assistance is needed in this part of the world.
The AMMRT appeals to this organization  to fulfill the mission under which it was founded and help end the oppression and resultant suffering of the people of Pakistan.  If you do not help immediately, the death toll will inevitably rise, millions will continue to be displaced, suffer economic depression,  and fall ill to the scourge of diseases that are unearthed in the wake of calamitous natural disasters.  

We, the American Muslim Medical Relief Team, remain committed and willing to continue lending our assistance to the relief effort, but are insisting that the United Nations give immediate help, particularly in the light of these recent revelations of gross mismanagement and, indeed, neglect by the Pakistani government.
Please answer this urgent plea and do not hesitate to include us, as we, too, were established for the sole purpose of providing aid to mankind and we cannot sit idly by as this situation continues to unfold and deteriorate in the manner it has.  
We implore you to join us in bringing peace, stability, and hope to millions!

Contact Info:
American Muslim Medical Relief Team
(607) 467-4677
ammrt@iqou-moa.org

August 1, 2011

 

The world tends to turn a blind eye to the continued distress of a people when the spotlight of the media and the bold headlines desist, but the International Qur’anic Open University has steadied the course, not only dispatching the American Muslim Medical Relief Team (AMMRT) within hours of a catastrophic event, but by providing continuous support months or years after the world has forgotten the tragedy even while victims still suffer.

The American Muslims of the International Qur’anic Open University (IQOU) have received support from the citizens of Pakistan who are outraged after release of details in the latest example of maltreatment by the government of Pakistan towards IQOU staff when attempting to obtain their travel visas. In this latest occurrence, members of IQOU’s American Muslim Medical Relief Team (AMMRT) were harassed, treated harshly and denied approval to travel to a country where these same American Muslims have a known history of humanitarian service that spans over thirty years.

 

Not once has the Pakistani government expressed a word of gratefulness or appreciation for the selfless sacrifice of the Vice Chancellor of the International Qur’anic Open University, His Eminence El Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani, and his dedicated staff.

August 1, 2011

 

Editor Preface: Human Rights in Islam: “Son preference” has been forbidden in Islam for more than 1400 years. The Holy Last Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) also espoused rights of inheritance and choice in marriage to women when the rest of the world was steeped in abuse and oppression. Some of the ordinances of the Holy Last Messenger forbidding son preference include:  "Whoever has a female (daughter) and doesn't bury her alive nor scorn her nor give preference to his male child over her, Allah will admit him to Paradise;" and "Whoever has three daughters whom he provides shelter for, supports and marries off, Paradise becomes absolutely binding for him." It was said, 'What if they are two (daughters)?' The Prophet said, "Even if it's two."

 

Today, there appears to be a widespread return to the infringement upon the rights of women as illustrated in the following UN news article:

July 10, 2011

 

The World Forum on Early Childhood Care and Education 2011 brought to beautiful Hawaii over 1000 delegates from around the world who shared a common interest in the welfare of children from birth to about age 8 years. Delegates representing many Muslim countries were quite visible. Attendants included university professors, government officials, preschool teachers and administrators.

The most interesting thing I learnt as a delegate attending the World Forum, was that in many parts of the world, schools operate successfully without a building. Persons who are convinced that children should be educated, regardless of their circumstance, find creative ways of developing schooling programs to meet the needs of children, their families and the community. While some school models showcased at the World Forum, held May 2 -6, were developed for affluent societies such as the schools of Reggio Emilia in Italy, a variety of innovative models were also developed for children who were orphans, homeless, living in war zones or extremely poor.

 

May 25, 2011

 

Osama bin Laden has no one to blame but himself that he was a pawn of the intelligence community for decades, inevitably to be discarded, shot in the face, his body weighted down and cast to the bottom of the sea.

The parallel of bin Laden is mirrored in the annals of history, with the founder of Osama’s terrorist creed: Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab of Najd. It is necessary to comprehend bin Laden’s Wahhabite origins in bin Abdul Wahhab to truly understand what needs to be done to destroy the modern terrorist allegiance.

 

Bin Abdul Wahhab is the founder of Wahhabism, a wayward and murderous sect announced in Saudi Arabia, around 1738 A.D.. The relevant point in his history is that bin Abdul Wahhab was led, coaxed and prompted by a British intelligence agent known as Hempher. Confessions of a British Spy, a Hakikat Kitabevi publication, explains how Hempher, one of thousands of agents sent forth to reclaim and broaden the British Empire, set plots and laid traps of every imaginable kind to destroy Islam from within.

According to Confessions, the wide expanse of polytheistic lands in Asia posed no obstacle to British domination of the same because their religions did not inspire patriotism. However, love of one’s country being part and parcel of Islam, in addition to Muslims’ strong attachment to Islamic traditions and culture, rendered inhabitants of the Ottoman empire more resistant to slavery.

In the view of British intelligence, more subversive means had to be found to subdue the Muslim world. Hempher writes: “Islam was once a religion of administration and authority and Muslims were respected. It would be difficult to tell these respectable people that they are slaves now. Nor would it be possible to falsify the Islamic history and say to Muslims: The honour and respect you obtained at one time was the result of some (favourable) conditions. Those days are gone now, and they will never come back.”

Hempher used bin Abdul Wahhab’s ignorance and arrogance to mislead him and to spawn a new creed, one that shunned traditional Islamic scholars and theology. British intelligence, the puppet master of “Islamic” terrorism, would “insert heresies into Muslims’ credal tenets then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror,” Hempher said.

Osama bin Laden (a CIA asset, as will be expounded upon later in the text) and his Wahhabi minions: Salafis, Taliban, Al Qaeda and others carry out the underground mission to (1) defame Islam as promoting terrorism, and (2) to spark outrage amongst non-Muslims against those who follow the Islamic faith, the latter to such a degree that the 80-85% of Muslims in Pakistan and other countries who follow traditional Islam and reject Wahhabism, feel a heavy burden of proof to let the world know that neither Islam nor Muslims condone or support terrorist activity. 

The worst irony is that the vast majority of the people killed by Wahhabis are actually Muslim. This is not surprising when another parallel to the past is considered - the fact that bin Abdul Wahhab was gifted with munitions and encouraged to slaughter Muslims in Arabia by the tens of thousands to establish the current Wahhabi state --which he did. Osama bin Laden was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States and billions of dollars in weapons were given to the Taliban who were, at the time, fighting the Soviet Union. When Al Qaeda decided to form a global Wahhabi caliphate, the Taliban used the same weapons slaughtering Muslims in this attempt.

In a 1998 article “Terror ‘Blowback’ Burns CIA,” Andrew Marshall of the UK Independent detailed the connection between the CIA and Osama bin Laden, including his invitation to establish a non-profit organization, Al-Kifah, in the US during the Soviet campaign. Marshall concludes: ”There are probably only three people outside the U.S. government who ever knew exactly what role the Al-Kifah refugee centre really played, and how far the U.S. helped to build up Mr. bin Laden’s organisation. One was Mr. Azzam, the charismatic Palestinian who ran the Peshawar operation. He was killed by a car bomb in 1989. The second was Mustafa Shalabi, who ran Al-Kifah. He was murdered in 1991. The third is Osama bin Laden, and he is not telling.”

Texas Senator Ron Paul said upon bin Laden’s death, “Why does our government invite conspiracy theories? Why not show a picture [to publicly identify the body]?” The same can be applied with bin Laden’s connection with the CIA.

It is the most serious concern for humanity that a violent extremist sect has connections to an intelligence organization that has admittedly conducted experiments on its own people with mind control programs. The CIA’s MK-ULTRA harbored Nazi psychologists to brainwash civilians and military alike in the quest for perfect spies. CIA records that have been made public show how this was achieved by using hideous forms of torture to form a dissociative state in the victim who would ultimately utilize different personalities for different missions, none of them knowing what the other was programmed for or had achieved using the same body.

The results of the collaboration of a shadow government [that John F. Kennedy risked his life to restrain] with violent terrorists has been seen in the death and destruction dominating the world today.

Not Muslim.

Wahhabi extremists are not Muslim and have nothing to do with Islam. They have wound a circle of oppression by killing Muslims on one hand and encouraging the defamation of Islam on the other. This is done to such an extent that every terrorist act is blamed upon Muslims, who live in fear of harassment at every turn.

The cycle can only be broken with the simple understanding of what a Muslim is and is not. Writing for the UK Guardian, Stephen Suleyman Schwartz, author of The Two Faces of Islam: The House of Sa’ud from Tradition to Terror challenges the news media to “ask moderate Muslim scholars whether they consider Bin Laden to have died in a state of Islamic belief.” He continues in his article, “Osama bin Laden did not deserve an Islamic burial. That the U.S. forces washed the body and allowed a short recitation in Arabic, presumably ‘Al-Fatiha,’ the opening chapter of Qur’an, indicates that they believed he died as a Muslim.” Schwartz also issued a statement that “Bin Laden did not die a martyr of Islam … he was an apostate from Muslim belief in his defence of violence against civilians and other innocents,” and therefore not worthy of a Muslim burial.

Bury Wahhabism.

Muslims believe there are more important things than how bin Laden should have been buried; rather, bury his teachings, bury his false credibility, dig the grave and bury the doubt that bin Laden and other Wahhabi extremists are Muslim. This takes a concerted effort between Muslims and non-Muslims to win the War of Ideas.

Although interfaith forums take place all over the world, and Muslims and their Christian brethren gather [See UMCF, front page] to spread the peace taught by the Holy Messenger Jesus and the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad (may the peace of God be upon them), Muslims and non-Muslims must also work together to root out extremism at home and abroad.

The influence of Wahhabism flows from Saudi Arabia in the form of funding and educational materials. In Pakistan, madrassas (religious schools) have sprouted up one by one along the Indus River, funded by Saudi oil money, to teach the Wahhabi creed. In the Middle East and other Muslim and non-Muslim countries, the story is the same.

In fact, with Saudi funding, Wahhabis have virtually taken over the Islamic field of electronic and print media. Darus Salaam Publications in the United States is allowed to disseminate material condemning all non-Wahhabis to death. Along with hate-filled Saudi literature, Darus Salaam books and literature flood bookstores in America. The sheer numbers of print material published in the US lend the impression that Wahabis are in the majority and therefore, must logically typify Islamic beliefs. With extremist material finding its way to state universities and public libraries, it is no wonder the majority of Americans assume that all Muslims have been taught extremist beliefs.

Nina Shea & Bonnie Alldredge wrote an article for the National Review in June 2010 called ”Saudi Textbooks: Still Teaching Hatred,” saying that “Saudi textbooks are also posted on the Saudi Education Ministry’s website and are shipped and distributed by a vast... infrastructure established with Saudi oil wealth to Muslim communities throughout the world. Given that most of the 9/11 terrorists and Osama bin Laden himself were Saudi-born and educated, it has to be acknowledged that Saudi education not only is deficient, but poses a direct danger to American national security.”

In order to sway Muslims from Islam, they seek to destroy the memory of Islam’s pious forbears by destroying the tombs of the exemplars of Islam, the blessed family of the Holy Last Messenger, Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). Part of Wahhabism’s mission, according to Confessions of a British Spy, was to destroy the Muslims’ connection with true Islam by, “deter[ring] Muslims from visiting the graves of Prophets, Khalîfas and pious Muslims by arising doubts about visiting graves. As it is fard (obligatory) to demolish all the mausoleums and domes in Muslim countries [according to British intelligence], so is it a must to bulldoze the cemetery called Bâkî [the burial place of the companions of the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad, peace be upon him, that is now razed].

What does this have to do with America? It is hoped that Americans will join hands; Christian and Muslim, Democrat and Republican, to root out a common enemy and safeguard our country from what seems to be a calculated plan of destruction. It is deplorable that the diabolical intentions of a few are bleeding the U.S. economy dry with war after war.

Bin Laden “claimed the 9/11 attacks were designed to, number one, get America to spread its military dangerously and excessively throughout the Middle East; two, to cause political dissension within the United States...and number three, to bankrupt America through excessive military spending, as he did to the Soviets.” “Hopefully, bin Laden does not get the last laugh,” said Senator Paul upon hearing of his death.

May 25, 2011

 

Osama bin Laden has no one to blame but himself that he was a pawn of the intelligence community for decades, inevitably to be discarded, shot in the face, his body weighted down and cast to the bottom of the sea.

The parallel of bin Laden is mirrored in the annals of history, with the founder of Osama’s terrorist creed: Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab of Najd. It is necessary to comprehend bin Laden’s Wahhabite origins in bin Abdul Wahhab to truly understand what needs to be done to destroy the modern terrorist allegiance.

 

Bin Abdul Wahhab is the founder of Wahhabism, a wayward and murderous sect announced in Saudi Arabia, around 1738 A.D.. The relevant point in his history is that bin Abdul Wahhab was led, coaxed and prompted by a British intelligence agent known as Hempher. Confessions of a British Spy, a Hakikat Kitabevi publication, explains how Hempher, one of thousands of agents sent forth to reclaim and broaden the British Empire, set plots and laid traps of every imaginable kind to destroy Islam from within.

According to Confessions, the wide expanse of polytheistic lands in Asia posed no obstacle to British domination of the same because their religions did not inspire patriotism. However, love of one’s country being part and parcel of Islam, in addition to Muslims’ strong attachment to Islamic traditions and culture, rendered inhabitants of the Ottoman empire more resistant to slavery.

In the view of British intelligence, more subversive means had to be found to subdue the Muslim world. Hempher writes: “Islam was once a religion of administration and authority and Muslims were respected. It would be difficult to tell these respectable people that they are slaves now. Nor would it be possible to falsify the Islamic history and say to Muslims: The honour and respect you obtained at one time was the result of some (favourable) conditions. Those days are gone now, and they will never come back.”

Hempher used bin Abdul Wahhab’s ignorance and arrogance to mislead him and to spawn a new creed, one that shunned traditional Islamic scholars and theology. British intelligence, the puppet master of “Islamic” terrorism, would “insert heresies into Muslims’ credal tenets then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror,” Hempher said.

Osama bin Laden (a CIA asset, as will be expounded upon later in the text) and his Wahhabi minions: Salafis, Taliban, Al Qaeda and others carry out the underground mission to (1) defame Islam as promoting terrorism, and (2) to spark outrage amongst non-Muslims against those who follow the Islamic faith, the latter to such a degree that the 80-85% of Muslims in Pakistan and other countries who follow traditional Islam and reject Wahhabism, feel a heavy burden of proof to let the world know that neither Islam nor Muslims condone or support terrorist activity. 

The worst irony is that the vast majority of the people killed by Wahhabis are actually Muslim. This is not surprising when another parallel to the past is considered - the fact that bin Abdul Wahhab was gifted with munitions and encouraged to slaughter Muslims in Arabia by the tens of thousands to establish the current Wahhabi state --which he did. Osama bin Laden was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States and billions of dollars in weapons were given to the Taliban who were, at the time, fighting the Soviet Union. When Al Qaeda decided to form a global Wahhabi caliphate, the Taliban used the same weapons slaughtering Muslims in this attempt.

In a 1998 article “Terror ‘Blowback’ Burns CIA,” Andrew Marshall of the UK Independent detailed the connection between the CIA and Osama bin Laden, including his invitation to establish a non-profit organization, Al-Kifah, in the US during the Soviet campaign. Marshall concludes: ”There are probably only three people outside the U.S. government who ever knew exactly what role the Al-Kifah refugee centre really played, and how far the U.S. helped to build up Mr. bin Laden’s organisation. One was Mr. Azzam, the charismatic Palestinian who ran the Peshawar operation. He was killed by a car bomb in 1989. The second was Mustafa Shalabi, who ran Al-Kifah. He was murdered in 1991. The third is Osama bin Laden, and he is not telling.”

Texas Senator Ron Paul said upon bin Laden’s death, “Why does our government invite conspiracy theories? Why not show a picture [to publicly identify the body]?” The same can be applied with bin Laden’s connection with the CIA.

It is the most serious concern for humanity that a violent extremist sect has connections to an intelligence organization that has admittedly conducted experiments on its own people with mind control programs. The CIA’s MK-ULTRA harbored Nazi psychologists to brainwash civilians and military alike in the quest for perfect spies. CIA records that have been made public show how this was achieved by using hideous forms of torture to form a dissociative state in the victim who would ultimately utilize different personalities for different missions, none of them knowing what the other was programmed for or had achieved using the same body.

The results of the collaboration of a shadow government [that John F. Kennedy risked his life to restrain] with violent terrorists has been seen in the death and destruction dominating the world today.

Not Muslim.

Wahhabi extremists are not Muslim and have nothing to do with Islam. They have wound a circle of oppression by killing Muslims on one hand and encouraging the defamation of Islam on the other. This is done to such an extent that every terrorist act is blamed upon Muslims, who live in fear of harassment at every turn.

The cycle can only be broken with the simple understanding of what a Muslim is and is not. Writing for the UK Guardian, Stephen Suleyman Schwartz, author of The Two Faces of Islam: The House of Sa’ud from Tradition to Terror challenges the news media to “ask moderate Muslim scholars whether they consider Bin Laden to have died in a state of Islamic belief.” He continues in his article, “Osama bin Laden did not deserve an Islamic burial. That the U.S. forces washed the body and allowed a short recitation in Arabic, presumably ‘Al-Fatiha,’ the opening chapter of Qur’an, indicates that they believed he died as a Muslim.” Schwartz also issued a statement that “Bin Laden did not die a martyr of Islam … he was an apostate from Muslim belief in his defence of violence against civilians and other innocents,” and therefore not worthy of a Muslim burial.

Bury Wahhabism.

Muslims believe there are more important things than how bin Laden should have been buried; rather, bury his teachings, bury his false credibility, dig the grave and bury the doubt that bin Laden and other Wahhabi extremists are Muslim. This takes a concerted effort between Muslims and non-Muslims to win the War of Ideas.

Although interfaith forums take place all over the world, and Muslims and their Christian brethren gather [See UMCF, front page] to spread the peace taught by the Holy Messenger Jesus and the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad (may the peace of God be upon them), Muslims and non-Muslims must also work together to root out extremism at home and abroad.

The influence of Wahhabism flows from Saudi Arabia in the form of funding and educational materials. In Pakistan, madrassas (religious schools) have sprouted up one by one along the Indus River, funded by Saudi oil money, to teach the Wahhabi creed. In the Middle East and other Muslim and non-Muslim countries, the story is the same.

In fact, with Saudi funding, Wahhabis have virtually taken over the Islamic field of electronic and print media. Darus Salaam Publications in the United States is allowed to disseminate material condemning all non-Wahhabis to death. Along with hate-filled Saudi literature, Darus Salaam books and literature flood bookstores in America. The sheer numbers of print material published in the US lend the impression that Wahabis are in the majority and therefore, must logically typify Islamic beliefs. With extremist material finding its way to state universities and public libraries, it is no wonder the majority of Americans assume that all Muslims have been taught extremist beliefs.

Nina Shea & Bonnie Alldredge wrote an article for the National Review in June 2010 called ”Saudi Textbooks: Still Teaching Hatred,” saying that “Saudi textbooks are also posted on the Saudi Education Ministry’s website and are shipped and distributed by a vast... infrastructure established with Saudi oil wealth to Muslim communities throughout the world. Given that most of the 9/11 terrorists and Osama bin Laden himself were Saudi-born and educated, it has to be acknowledged that Saudi education not only is deficient, but poses a direct danger to American national security.”

In order to sway Muslims from Islam, they seek to destroy the memory of Islam’s pious forbears by destroying the tombs of the exemplars of Islam, the blessed family of the Holy Last Messenger, Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). Part of Wahhabism’s mission, according to Confessions of a British Spy, was to destroy the Muslims’ connection with true Islam by, “deter[ring] Muslims from visiting the graves of Prophets, Khalîfas and pious Muslims by arising doubts about visiting graves. As it is fard (obligatory) to demolish all the mausoleums and domes in Muslim countries [according to British intelligence], so is it a must to bulldoze the cemetery called Bâkî [the burial place of the companions of the Holy Last Messenger Muhammad, peace be upon him, that is now razed].

What does this have to do with America? It is hoped that Americans will join hands; Christian and Muslim, Democrat and Republican, to root out a common enemy and safeguard our country from what seems to be a calculated plan of destruction. It is deplorable that the diabolical intentions of a few are bleeding the U.S. economy dry with war after war.

Bin Laden “claimed the 9/11 attacks were designed to, number one, get America to spread its military dangerously and excessively throughout the Middle East; two, to cause political dissension within the United States...and number three, to bankrupt America through excessive military spending, as he did to the Soviets.” “Hopefully, bin Laden does not get the last laugh,” said Senator Paul upon hearing of his death.

March 24, 2011

What is now  known as the “burqa ban” will become law on April 11. French Prime Minister Francois Fillan will see to it that the approximately 2,000 or so Muslim women do not have a choice in donning the face covering known as niqab in any place deemed public domain as defined by government officials. The burqa is a one piece garment that covers the contours of awoman’s body from head to toe; it has a detachable niqab that covers the face, with the exception of the eyes, and it promotes modesty and morality in its wearer. Its colors vary according to culture and preference of the women in different geographical areas.

 

March 23, 2011

 

Muslims take great pride in attaining the treasure of knowledge, inspired by an Islamic tradition [hadith] that says, "Seek knowledge, even unto China." The quote points to the importance of seeking knowledge, even if it means enduring the hardship of travelling far distances. At the time of the Holy Last Messenger  Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, China was considered the most developed civilization of the period. Islam in China began during the caliphate of 'Uthman ibn Affan, upon him mercy, the third caliph. After triumphing over the Byzantines, Romans and the Persians, 'Uthman ibn Affan, dispatched a deputation to China in 29 AH (650 C.E., eighteen years after the Holy Last Messenger, peace be upon him, passed away), under the leadership by Sa'ad ibn Abi Waqqaas, upon him mercy, Nabi Muhammad's  (peace be upon him) maternal uncle, inviting the Chinese emperor to embrace Islam.

 

 

March 23, 2011

 

Muslims take great pride in attaining the treasure of knowledge, inspired by an Islamic tradition [hadith] that says, "Seek knowledge, even unto China." The quote points to the importance of seeking knowledge, even if it means enduring the hardship of travelling far distances. At the time of the Holy Last Messenger  Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, China was considered the most developed civilization of the period. Islam in China began during the caliphate of 'Uthman ibn Affan, upon him mercy, the third caliph. After triumphing over the Byzantines, Romans and the Persians, 'Uthman ibn Affan, dispatched a deputation to China in 29 AH (650 C.E., eighteen years after the Holy Last Messenger, peace be upon him, passed away), under the leadership by Sa'ad ibn Abi Waqqaas, upon him mercy, Nabi Muhammad's  (peace be upon him) maternal uncle, inviting the Chinese emperor to embrace Islam.

 

 

June 10, 2010

In parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America, particularly Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru, peasants and indigenous farmers are losing tens of millions of hectares of their fertile farmland to foreign states and private sector investors. These invaders, representing large banks and agribusiness corporations are grabbing the land from their rightful owners and using it to produce food and fuel, primarily for export, not with a concern for reducing worldwide poverty, but moreso to gain profit.

In parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America, particularly Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru, peasants and indigenous farmers are losing tens of millions of hectares of their fertile farmland to foreign states and private sector investors. These invaders, representing large banks and agribusiness corporations are grabbing the land from their rightful owners and using it to produce food and fuel, primarily for export, not with a concern for reducing worldwide poverty, but moreso to gain profit.

June 6, 2010

In late March, the House of Representatives soundly rejected a call to withdraw American troops by the end of the year, in a strong bipartisan endorsement by President Obama’s administration policy in Afghanistan.
According to NY times, after spending over three hours to debate allowing antiwar Democrats to air their dissent, the House voted 356 to 65 to reject the withdrawal proposal.

In late March, the House of Representatives soundly rejected a call to withdraw American troops by the end of the year, in a strong bipartisan endorsement by President Obama’s administration policy in Afghanistan.
According to NY times, after spending over three hours to debate allowing antiwar Democrats to air their dissent, the House voted 356 to 65 to reject the withdrawal proposal.

June 6, 2010

On June 8, 1967, two squadrons of Israeli warplanes bombed, napalmed and machine-gunned the US intelligence-gathering ship, USS Liberty, in international waters, killing 34 US sailors and wounding another 172.  The assault took place on a sunny afternoon, with the US flag and identifying markers clearly visible.  The Israelis targeted the antennae to prevent the crew from broadcasting for help and shot up the lifeboats to ensure no survivors.  There were, however, survivors who rigged up an antenna and radioed their distress, a call for help that reached Washington D.C.  In an unprecedented act of betrayal, President Johnson, in close liaison with powerful American Jewish Zionist political backers, covered up the mass murder on the high seas by issuing orders first to recall Mediterranean-based warplanes from rushing to assist their besieged comrades, then threatening to court-martial the survivors who might expose the deliberate nature of the Israeli assault and finally by repeating the Israeli line that the attack was a matter of mistaken identity, a lie which numerous military leaders later rejected.

Introduction:  Israel Crimes on the High Seas